Flat 11, Margaret Court, 269 South Coast Road, Peacehaven, East Sussex BN10 7PQ
CHI/21UF/LSC/2022/0019 · service charges · Lewes · decided 20 Jun 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the demand dated 25 May 2021 not payable under the lease, as it sought a balance brought forward and advance payments exceeding the £40 on-account sum allowed, and refused the applicants' application for appointment of a manager.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Margaret Court (Peacehaven) RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 15 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £1,022.60 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Respondent opposes the application and 8 of the 15 flats have also objected.
- management company
Respondent : [name] Court (Peacehaven) RTM Company Limited
- years
an application seeking the Tribunal's determination of the service charges payable for the period 24 June 2021 to 23 June 2022
- outcome
As a result the sum cannot be demanded of the Applicant and so the demand is not payable.
- items reduced
As a result the sum cannot be demanded of the Applicant and so the demand is not payable.
- total demanded
The validity of the demand dated 25 May 2021 in the sum of £1,022.60.
- s20c
Considering matters in this instance we decline to make any such orders.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.