Flat 11, Abbotsford Court, 3 Lakeside Drive, Park Royal, London NW10 7FZ
LON/00AE/LSC/2022/0231 · service charges · Brent · decided 24 Jan 2023
The tribunal found the estate charges of £602.92 for 2020, 2021 and 2022 reasonable and payable, and refused the applicant's requests for orders limiting the landlord's costs.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 7 Limited |
| Management company | First Central Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £602.92 |
| Total found payable | £602.92 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
[name] 7 Limited, should be substituted as the respondent.
- management company
is the named management company under the Superior Lease
- years
the sums for 2020 of £225.36, for 2021 of £169.82 and for 2022 of £206.92
- outcome
both reasonable and payable by the applicant to the respondent
- total demanded
the total in dispute being £602.92
- total payable
the total in dispute being £602.92
- s20c
The applications pursuant to Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and Schedule paragraph 5A of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 are dismissed
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.