Flat 11, 27 Upper Bond St, Hinckley, Leics LE10 1WA

CAM/31UE/LIS/2019/0033 · LIS · Hinckley and Bosworth · decided 9 Apr 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal determined that the service charges payable for 2015 to 2017 were £87.05, £430.99 and £646.94, with 2016 and 2017 costs reduced under section 20B, the lift repair costs limited to £250 because consultation requirements were not met, and the landlord's costs excluded from the service charge under section 20C.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Consultation failure found
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Diamond Red Limited
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 26 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2017
Items in dispute	cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	cleaning and grounds, insurance, repairs and maintenance
Total demanded	£1,385.64
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	no order for the respondent to reimburse the applicants' application fee

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Respondent : Diamond Red Limited
years: for 2017, are in the sum of £646.94.
outcome: will be limited to £250, which is the “appropriate amount” under the Service Charges
items reduced: any service charge which reflects them is not payable, except in relation to the payment on completion of the Lease and the following costs incurred later:
total demanded: only that the sum of £1,385.64 is in dispute.
s20c: the tribunal determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances
s20: Since it appears that the consultation requirements have not been
costs: the tribunal does not order the Respondent to reimburse the application fee

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.