Flat 10-15 Faircross Court, 77-79 Bath Rd, Thatcham, Berkshire, RG18 3GL
CAM/00MB/LDC/2019/0008 · dispensation from consultation · West Berkshire · decided 29 Jan 2019
The tribunal granted the applicant dispensation from further consultation requirements for urgent work to remedy a leak from the flat roof above Flat 11.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Faircross Court Management Co. (Thatcham) Ltd |
| Managing agent | Pinnacle Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Faircross Court Management Co. (Thatcham) Ltd
- agent
Representative : Pinnacle Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation from further consultation requirements for work to remedy the leak from the flat roof above Flat 11.
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation from further consultation requirements for work to remedy the leak from the flat roof above Flat 11.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.