Flat 1 Kings Court, 38 Hatherley Road, Sidcup, Kent, DA14 4AT
LON/00AD/LSC/2021/0285 · service charges · Bexley · decided 15 Jan 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found service charges payable for 2009 to 2019 but disallowed legal fees, found no reserve fund provision in the lease, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Triplerose Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, management fees, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted block of 12 flats
- items reduced
The legal fees are therefore disallowed for the years in dispute.
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.