Flat 1, Hanover Court, Waltham Abbey, EN9 1HR
CAM/22UK/LBC/2025/0011 · breach of lease · Epping Forest · decided 22 Jun 2026
The tribunal determined that the leaseholder breached clauses 4(v) and 4(vii) of the lease by failing to allow access to the freeholder's employee on four occasions, keeping rubbish that caused a smell, cockroach infestation and carpet damage, and causing nuisance and annoyance through night-time noise and intimidating behaviour.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Hanover Court is a block of 6 independent-living retirement flats
- outcome
The tribunal determines that breaches of clause 4(v) and 4(vii) of the lease dated 6 December 2017 have occurred
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.