Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RH1 4LB

Flat 1, Castle Place, Castle Square, Bletchingley, Surrey, RH1 4LB

CHI/43UF/LSC/2023/0075 · service charges · Tandridge · decided 29 Jan 2024

The tribunal found the full service charge budget sums of £50,560.40 claimed by the tribunal-appointed manager payable by the leaseholder, as reasonable and properly apportioned at 33%.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 5 flats
Service charge years in dispute2020, 2021, 2022
Items in disputeadministration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£50,560.40
Total found payable£50,560.40
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The remaining 5 flats, including the Respondents, are accessed via the main front door.
outcome
We find the sum payable in respect of service charges is £50,560.40.
total demanded
The amount claimed in respect of service charges is £50,560.40.
total payable
We find the sum payable in respect of service charges is £50,560.40.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.