Flat 1, Burton Hall, Burton Hall Drive, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, LE14 2UN
BIR/31UG/LIS/2021/0049 · LIS · Melton · decided 6 May 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the £16,064 cost of fire alarm works required by the fire authority was properly payable through the service charge, including the works inside the flats, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Waterglen Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £16,064 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent is Waterglen Ltd
- years
in the 2020 service charge year
- outcome
the sum of £16,064 was properly payable by service charge payers at the Property in the 2020 service charge year
- total demanded
That sum has been charged to the service charge payable by the lessees of the Property
- total payable
the sum of £16,064 was properly payable by service charge payers
- s20c
We make no order under section 20C.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.