Flat 1, Burton Hall, Burton Hall Drive, Burton Lazars, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE14 2UN
BIR/31UG/LIS/2020/0019 · LIS · Melton · decided 20 Oct 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the fire safety works required by the fire authority, except works inside the leaseholder's flat, are recoverable through the service charge or the lease, and the reserve fund may be used, but refused the section 20C and paragraph 5A applications.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Waterglen Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HLM Property Management |
| Building | One flat, 19 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising around 19 flats, 17 of which
- freeholder
Respondent : Waterglen Ltd
- agent
via an agent called HLM Property Management
- outcome
We determine that all the costs which either have been or are to be
- s20c
We refuse the applications under 20C of the Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.