Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near LE14 2UN

Flat 1, Burton Hall, Burton Hall Drive, Burton Lazars, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE14 2UN

BIR/31UG/LIS/2020/0019 · LIS · Melton · decided 20 Oct 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal decided that the fire safety works required by the fire authority, except works inside the leaseholder's flat, are recoverable through the service charge or the lease, and the reserve fund may be used, but refused the section 20C and paragraph 5A applications.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordWaterglen Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentHLM Property Management
BuildingOne flat, 19 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising around 19 flats, 17 of which
freeholder
Respondent : Waterglen Ltd
agent
via an agent called HLM Property Management
outcome
We determine that all the costs which either have been or are to be
s20c
We refuse the applications under 20C of the Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.