Flat 1 & 2, 44 Armley Ridge Road, Leeds LS12 3NP
MAN/00DA/LSC/2018/0005 · service charges · Leeds · decided 20 Jul 2021
The tribunal rejected the leaseholder's challenge to the 2016 to 2018 service charges for Flats 1 and 2 apart from deducting £38.73 from the 2018 charge for Flat 2 for a socket installed in the common parts.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | RG Reversion 2014 Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Inspired Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It has been converted into three separate dwellings.
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 2014 Ltd
- agent
It appointed Inspired Property Management Ltd
- years
seeking a determination of liability to pay and reasonableness of service charges for the years 2016-7, 2017, and 2018.
- outcome
The application in relation to 2018 succeeds to the extent that £38.73 is deducted from the total due.
- items reduced
This item must therefore be excluded from the service charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.