Flat 1, 39 Jeckells Road, Stalham, Norfolk NR12 9FN
CAM/33UF/LIS/2024/0009 · LIS · North Norfolk · decided 21 Jul 2025
The tribunal decided that the challenged service charges for gardening, cleaning, management, electrical testing, balancing and grounds and general maintenance for 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023 at Flat 1, 39 Jeckells Road were reasonable and payable as demanded, and made no costs order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Elmbirch Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Watsons Property Group |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a small block comprising 4 flats
- freeholder
Elmbirch Properties Limited
- agent
[name] of Watsons Property Group
- years
2019 (gardening), 2021 (EICR fixed wire test, cleaning, and management fee), 2022 (the end of year balancing charge), and 2023
- outcome
Every one of the service charge items challenged has been determined by the tribunal to be reasonable and payable in the sum demanded.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.