Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near W1H 5QE

Flat 1, 30 Upper Berkeley Street, London W1H 5QE

LON/00BK/LSC/2022/0325 · service charges · Westminster · decided 19 Jun 2023

The tribunal found the porterage charges not payable at all and limited the leaseholder's contributions to cleaning and management fees to £100 per year each for 2015/16 to 2021/22 because the landlord failed to consult on long-term contracts, while other charges were found payable in full.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationConsultation failure found
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentSquare Estate Management Limited
BuildingOne flat, 6 flats
Service charge years in dispute2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021
Items in disputeadministration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedcleaning and grounds, management fees, other
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe applicant's Paragraph 5A order: none of the respondents' costs of the proceedings can be charged direct to the appli

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Property is a flat within a town house containing 6 flats.
agent
Ms [name] of Square Estate Management Limited – the Respondents’ managing agents
years
In relation to each of the service charge years 2015/16 to 2021/22 inclusive
outcome
the porterage charges are not payable at all by the Applicant;
items reduced
the Applicant’s contribution towards the cleaning charges is limited to £100 per year;
s20c
The tribunal also makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in favour of the Applicant that no more than 50%
s20
The Respondents have neither complied with the consultation requirements in relation to these contracts nor applied for dispensation.
costs
none of the costs incurred by the Respondents in connection with these proceedings can be charged direct to the Applicant as an administration charge under his lease.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.