Flat 1, 30 Park Road, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex TN39 3HX
CHI/21UG/LSC/2022/0107 · service charges · Rother · decided 9 Jan 2023
The tribunal found no valid demand had been issued for the major works and that the statutory consultation was defective, so the respondent is not currently liable for the sum claimed, and any liability would be capped at £250.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Park Road (Bexhill) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | £6,910 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
we determined that the Respondent was not currently liable for the sum claimed
- items reduced
the Respondent has no liability for the costs of the major works claimed by the Applicant
- total demanded
the costs of the major works only from Mr [name] which totalled £6,910
- s20
the statutory consultation undertaken by the Applicant in respect of the major works was defective
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.