Flat 1 28 Shepherds Hill London N6 5AH
LON/00AP/LSC/2018/0408 · service charges · Haringey · decided 18 Apr 2019
The tribunal decided that £14,342.98 is payable for the 2016 to 2018 service charge years, less two payments of £1,252.78 already made, that the tenant must reimburse £300 of the landlord's tribunal fees, and that no section 20C order would be made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Meadow View Property Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £14,342.98 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse tribunal fees of £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been converted into eight residential flats
- years
for the years 2016 – 2017 and 2017 – 2018
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £ 14,342.98 is payable by the
- total payable
The tribunal determines that the sum of £ 14,342.98 is payable by the
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the
- costs
the Respondent shall pay the Applicant £300 within 28 days of this Decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.