Flat 1, 1a West Hill Road, St Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex TN38 0NA
CHI/21UD/LSC/2019/0018 · service charges · Hastings · decided 10 Sep 2019
The tribunal found that no valid service charge demands had been issued, so none of the sums claimed for 2014 to 2018 are currently payable, and it ordered the respondent to pay £300 in tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Ooty Freehold Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Godfrey John & Partners |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay tribunal fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the service charges were apportioned equally between all 6 flats
- management company
Applicant : Ooty Freehold Management Limited
- agent
Representative : [name]
- years
2014 £779.87
- outcome
Taking account of the above currently none of the sums claimed are payable by the Respondent.
- costs
The tribunal is satisfied that the Respondent should pay the tribunals fees of £300.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.