Flat 1, 12 Castledine Road, Anerley, London SE20 8PL
LON/00AF/LDC/2025/0814 · dispensation from consultation · Bromley · decided 27 Jan 2026
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the flat roof repairs carried out in June and July 2023, with no conditions attached.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 12 Castledine Management Limited |
| Management company | Castledine Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into three flats
- freeholder
Applicant : 12 Castledine Management Limited
- years
GWL undertook the flat roof repairs in June and July 2023 at a total cost of £22,062.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in relation to repairs undertaken to the flat roof
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.