Flat 05, 333 Clapham Road, Stockwell, London SW9 9BS
LON/00AY/LSC/2021/0165 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 29 Jul 2021
The tribunal found the landlord failed to give the leaseholder the required section 20 notice of repair works, so the charge is limited to £250 and the landlord cannot recover its costs of the case through the service charge.
| Outcome | Substantially reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £1,633.96 |
| Total found payable | £250 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The service charge payable by the Applicant in respect of repair and maintenance works invoiced on 21st September 2018 is limited to £250.
- items reduced
is limited to £250.
- total demanded
£1,633.96 for the cost of repair and maintenance works
- total payable
is limited to £250.
- s20c
The Respondent may not recover their costs of these proceedings through the service charge, in accordance with section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Respondent clearly failed to comply with paragraph 1(1)(a).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.