Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Search

Fitzroy Place 1 Nassau Street and 3-7 Pearson Square Fitzrovia London W1T

LON/00BK/LDC/2023/0124 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 13 Jul 2023

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing obsolete fire alarm panels at the Fitzrovia development, with no objections received from leaseholders.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyFitzroy Place Management Co Ltd
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 291 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The application describes the property as a development made up of 291 units
management company
Applicant: Fitzroy Place Management Co Ltd
outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works
s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.