First, second and third floor flat, 120 Kensington Park Road, London W11 2PW
LON/00AW/LBC/2021/0005 · breach of lease · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 30 Apr 2021
The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach any of the four lease covenants alleged, mainly because the freeholder's predecessor had waived or consented to the flooring, curtains and subletting, and the other breaches were not proven.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Respondent has not breached any of the covenants contained in clauses 3(7), 3(13), 3(20) or 3(33) of the lease.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.