First Floor Flat, Ashmary, 7 Hillside Road, Clevedon, North Somerset, BS21 7XJ
HAV/00HC/LSC/2025/0776 · service charges · North Somerset · decided 4 Aug 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the 2021 roof works and found the leaseholder liable to pay £5,072.30, half of the roofing cost, as the works were reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £10,114.60 |
| Total found payable | £5,072.30 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
believed to have been converted into two flats in the 1970s
- years
in respect of the 2021 roof works.
- outcome
the Respondent is liable for half, being £5,072.30, as set out in the lease
- total demanded
The application refers to the roofing works (2021) which totalled £10,114.60
- total payable
the Respondent is liable for half, being £5,072.30, as set out in the lease
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants the application for dispensation.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.