Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near E7 0AR

First Floor Flat, 69 Pevensey Road, London E7 0AR

LON/00BH/LSC/2021/0041 · service charges · Waltham Forest · decided 18 May 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the £316.92 insurance charge for 2020-2021 reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, and refused the applications for orders limiting the landlord's costs under section 20C and paragraph 5A.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentUrbanpoint Property Management Ltd
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2020
Items in disputeinsurance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£316.92
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a converted house which contains one other flat
years
in the 2020-2021 service charge year
outcome
is reasonable and payable by the Applicant
total demanded
a charge of £316.92 made by the Respondent in respect of insurance cover
total payable
is reasonable and payable by the Applicant
s20c
(2) The application for an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.