Fernhill House, Boundary Road, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 6SU
CHI/24UL/LDC/2022/0049 · dispensation from consultation · Rushmoor · decided 11 Aug 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency refurbishment works to the lift at Fernhill House carried out in September 2021, finding no prejudice to the tenants.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising one block of 27 studio, one bedroom and three bedroom flats
- years
emergency refurbishment works which were carried out to the lift at Fernhill House in September 2021
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of emergency refurbishment works
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.