Fairlawnes, Maldon Road, Wallington, Surrey SM6 8BG
LON/00BF/LSC/2022/0019 · service charges · Sutton · decided 3 Aug 2022
The tribunal decided that the roof to Block D needs replacing and that the schedule of works and specification are reasonable, but did not approve the current quotes because the contractor's price could not be confirmed as still valid.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairlawnes Wallington Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Harris Property Management |
| Building | An estate, 56 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Respondents are the leaseholders of the 56 flats situated in four purpose-built blocks of flats making up the Property.
- freeholder
The Application is made by Fairlawnes Wallington Limited, (the Applicant) the landlord of the property
- agent
Mr [name] of [name] Property Management, who is not only the managing agent for the Property
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the works to the roof of Block D are required and that the proposal for such works is, save as to the costs of same, reasonable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.