Fair Mile Building, Reading Road, Cholsey, Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 9GR & others
CAM/34UD/LVT/2019/0004 · LVT · South Oxfordshire · decided 11 Nov 2019
The tribunal declined to vary the leases as the leaseholders' residents association had applied, because the object could not be achieved without also varying the housing association leases, but it made an order under section 20C so the freeholder's costs of the application cannot be added to the leaseholders' service charges.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cholsey Fair Mile Limited |
| Management company | Cholsey Meadows Management Company |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 130 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 130 flats within the Building
- freeholder
Respondent (1) : [name] Limited (Landlord
- management company
Respondent (3) : [name] Management Company
- outcome
It will not make an order varying the leases in the manner
- s20c
It does make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.