Empire Wharf Block A 1-16 & Block B 17-52, 229-235 Old Ford Road, London E3 5NQ
LON/00BG/LDC/2022/0053 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 6 Jun 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a collapsing canal towpath next to the Empire Wharf blocks, because the works were an emergency and the leaseholders were not shown to have suffered prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £21,727.72 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
fifty two self-contained flats built at Empire Wharf
- freeholder
Applicant : Southern Land Securities Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any
- total demanded
The estimated cost of the works is £21, 727.72.
- s20
Due to the emergency nature of the works no consultation process occurred prior to the commencement of the canal bank side repair works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.