Elmleigh Court, Petersfield Road, Midhurst, West Sussex, GU29 9HB
CHI/45UD/LSC/2023/0170 · service charges · Chichester · decided 5 Nov 2024
The tribunal decided that the £2,160 cost of removing failed cavity wall insulation from Flats 7 and 8 is a valid landlord expense that can be recovered as a service charge from all 12 leaseholders.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Elmleigh Court Resident’s Association |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Gray Property Management Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,160 |
| Total found payable | £2,160 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a development of 12 separate dwellings
- freeholder
The freehold is held by [name] Court Resident’s Association
- agent
Gray Property Management
- years
for the year 2024
- outcome
The £2,160 expended by the landlord Association in complying with their obligations in this respect can therefore properly be recovered from all 12 leaseholders
- total demanded
The cost of such works would be £2,160.
- total payable
The £2,160 expended by the landlord Association in complying with their obligations in this respect can therefore properly be recovered
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.