Elliott House, 79a Alvington Crescent, E8 2NN
LON/00AM/LRM/2025/0031 · right to manage · Hackney · decided 10 Feb 2026
The tribunal decided that the RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage Elliott House, rejecting the freeholder's objections on membership and commercial floor area, and ordered the freeholder to pay the £114 tribunal fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant £114 under Rule 13(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Propert |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The premises is a block of three self-contained apartments held on long residential leases
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Applicant was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises pursuant to section 84(5)(a) of the Act.
- costs
the Tribunal orders the Respondent to reimburse the Applicant the sum of £114 under Rule 13(2)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.