Ella Grove, Off Mobberley Road, Knutsford, Cheshire, WA16 8UT
MAN/00EQ/LSC/2022/0075 · service charges · Cheshire East · decided 10 Jul 2023
The tribunal found that the sinking fund elements of the service charges for 2021-22 and 2022-23 are not payable at this point in time because the lease's agreement requirement for the extended period had not been met, and it made no finding on reasonableness.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Peaks and Plains Housing Trust |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Peaks and Plains Housing Trust:
- years
The application related to the service charge years 2021-22 and 2022-23 inclusive
- outcome
we find that the elements of service charge which relate to the sinking fund are not payable by the leaseholders at this point in time.
- items reduced
the elements of service charge which relate to the sinking fund are not payable by the leaseholders at this point in time.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.