Eldon Court, Brondesbury Road, Kilburn London NW6 6AX
LON/00AE/LDC/2025/0768 · dispensation from consultation · Brent · decided 21 Aug 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency roof repairs carried out to stop a leak affecting flat 8 at Eldon Court, and made no costs order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Eldon Court Freeholders Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Ringley Chartered Surveyors |
| Building | A block, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose-built block, of 15 flats over 3 storeys
- freeholder
Eldon Court Freeholders Limited
- agent
made on behalf of the landlord by Ringley Chartered Surveyors who are the managing agents
- years
works started on 2nd June 2025 and were completed at a cost £5,880 inclusive of VAT
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to roof repairs
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the major works relating to roof repairs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.