Edgar House, Bawtry Road, Bessacarr, Doncaster DN4 7AW
MAN/00CE/LDC/2021/0085 · dispensation from consultation · Doncaster · decided 3 May 2022
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of two sewage pumps at Edgar House, making no finding on whether the resulting charges are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | River Freeholds Limited |
| Management company | Inspired Property Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | Inspired Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising of 8 units over 4 stories
- freeholder
The application was made by River Freeholds Limited, the landlord of Edgar
- agent
Applicant’s Representative : Inspired Property Management Ltd
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works comprising the replacement of two sewage pumps at the Property.
- s20
I therefore conclude that retrospective dispensation should be granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.