Ditton Place School, Brantridge Lane, Balcombe, West Sussex RH17 6JR
CHI/45UG/LVM/2019/0001 · variation of a management order · Mid Sussex · decided 5 Apr 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal varied the management order for the Ditton Place estate, extending its scope to cover the land transferred to NewCo, requiring the lessees who control NewCo to procure its compliance with the order, and making several ancillary orders on funding, set-off and costs protection for the manager.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Ditton Place Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
conversion of Main House and Coach House at Ditton Place into twelve flats demised on long leases
- freeholder
Ditton Place Management Company Limited (“ManCo”), the management company under the tripartite leases, was registered as freehold proprietor of the entire estate
- management company
Ditton Place Management Company Limited (“ManCo”), the management company under the tripartite leases
- outcome
The Management Order remains in force until 24 January 2020, although it could be extended.
- s20c
The Tribunal's view is that, given the difficulties encountered to date, it is appropriate to include an explicit provision which protects Mr [name] from an adverse costs order unless that order has been made on the ground of his unreasonable conduct.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.