Ditton Place School, Brantridge Lane, Balcombe, West Sussex, RH17 6JR
CHI/45UG/LVM/2018/0003 · variation of a management order · Mid Sussex · decided 7 Dec 2018
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the application by the first six applicants to vary the management order so that part of the Ditton Place estate would be removed from its scope, concluding the order should remain in effect.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ditton Place Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Ditton Place Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, major works, reserve fund, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Ditton Place Management Company Limited (Freeholder of part)
- management company
Ditton Place Management Company Limited (“ManCo”), the management company under the tripartite leases
- outcome
The application to vary the management order dated 1 February 2017 is dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.