Discovery House, 15 Susans Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 3AG
CHI/21UC/LDC/2020/0105 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 18 Mar 2021
The tribunal granted the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for fire safety works at Discovery House, subject to the applicant sending the decision and the three estimates to all leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tuscola (FC100) Limited |
| Management company | Tuscola (FC100) Limited |
| Managing agent | Plymouth Block Management |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : [name] (FC100) Limited
- agent
Representative : Plymouth Block Management
- outcome
On balance I am satisfied that the Applicant is entitled to dispensation from the requirements to consult pursuant to section 20ZA of the Act.
- s20
Upon the above conditions being complied with the Applicant is granted dispensation from consultation in respect of the works identified within the Firetec Report dated 10th June 2020.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.