Dibleys, Blewbury, Oxfordshire OX11 9PT
CAM/00MC/LDC/2022/0032 · dispensation from consultation · Vale of White Horse · decided 10 Feb 2023
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the consultation requirements for a three-year gas supply contract, on condition that the landlord provides the contract and an explanatory statement to leaseholders and bears its own application costs and the reasonable costs of the leaseholders' representative.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Dibleys Heritage Limited |
| Management company | Dibleys Heritage Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 45 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own dispensation application costs and the reasonable costs of Mr [name] |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Development includes 45 residential properties
- freeholder
Applicant : Dibleys Heritage Limited
- management company
The Applicant stated that whereas it operates as a Residents’ Management Company
- years
The current estimated total gas cost for 2022-23 is £68,000
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation procedure required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation procedure required by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as set out in Schedule 1 of the 2003 Regulations.
- costs
The Applicant shall be responsible for all the costs the Applicant has incurred in respect of the Dispensation Application and for Mr [name] reasonable costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.