Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near YO60 7PB

Derwent Court, Main Street, Howsham, York, YO60 7PB

MAN/36UF/LDC/2018/0038 · dispensation from consultation · North Yorkshire · decided 31 May 2019

The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the clock tower, leaving leaseholders free to challenge the cost later under section 27A.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companyDerwent Court Management Company Limited
Managing agentWatson Property Management
BuildingA block, 8 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Respondents are the leaseholders of the 8 flats at
management company
Derwent Court Management Company Limited (‘the Applicant’) applied to the Tribunal
agent
uses Watson Property Management to carry out the management
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.