Denton Court, 20 Denton Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7ST
HAV/21UC/LAM/2025/0619 · appointment of a manager · Eastbourne · decided 11 May 2026
The Tribunal found that the grounds for appointing a manager were met because of the trustees' admissions about management failures, but it decided not to appoint a manager because the trustees were instructing a professional managing agent and management was expected to improve.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, cleaning and grounds, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a Victorian block of six flats.
- outcome
As such, the Tribunal did not consider it just and convenient to appoint a manager at this time.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.