Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW3 4LA

Delahay House, 15 Chelsea Embankment London SW3 4LA

LON/00AW/LDC/2020/0134 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 10 Nov 2020

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for the already-completed phase 3 and 4 lift and power upgrade works at Delahay House, as no lessee objected.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordDelahay House Freehold Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 12 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
containing 12 flats over 6 floors including the basement
freeholder
Applicant : Delahay House Freehold Ltd
outcome
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.