Dales View Apartments, 340 Queens Promenade, Bispham, FY2 9AB
MAN/00EY/LDC/2023/0049 · dispensation from consultation · Blackpool · decided 22 Jan 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent additional bay-roof works at Dales View, finding the leaseholders were not prejudiced.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Grey GR Limited Partnership |
| Management company | Partnership Applicant’s Initially Principle Estate Management LLP |
| Managing agent | Principle Estate Management LLP |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Grey GR Limited Partnership
- agent
Applicant’s Initially Principle Estate Management LLP
- years
In 2019, the Applicant instructed works to take place to the external property
- outcome
the Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements unconditionally.
- s20
the Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements unconditionally.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.