Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN21 1EU

Cuckmere House, 18 Upperton Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 1EU

CHI/21UC/LDC/2022/0015 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 28 Mar 2022

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the remaining statutory consultation requirements for urgent lift repair works, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCuckmere House Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentHML Group
BuildingA block, 25 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
6-storey purpose built 1960/70’s building with 25 flats
freeholder
Applicant : Cuckmere House Limited
agent
Representative : HML Group
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works to the lift

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.