Crown Apartments, 45 Westholme Gardens, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 8QH
LON/00AS/LDC/2021/0123 · dispensation from consultation · Hillingdon · decided 20 Jul 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements to replace the foul sewage pumps at the property, as no leaseholders objected and no prejudice was found.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Principle Estate Management |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property is a purpose-built block of 24 apartments and a commercial unit located on the ground floor.
- agent
Representative : Principle Estate Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of works required at Crown Apartments, 45 Westholme Gardens
- s20
The Tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.