Cray House 40 Stoke Road Gosport Hampshire PO12 2LB
HAV/24UF/LDC/2026/0106 · dispensation from consultation · Gosport · decided 15 Jul 2026
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the waking watch and temporary alarm system, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cray House Residents Company Limited |
| Management company | Cray House Residents Company Limited |
| Managing agent | KJD residential property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
BLOCK OF 24 FLATS, HAS LOWER GROUND CAR PARK
- freeholder
Applicant : Cray House Residents Company Limited
- agent
Representative : KJD residential property Management
- outcome
The Applicant is granted retrospective dispensation under
- s20
The Applicant is granted retrospective dispensation under
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.