Cray House, 40 Stoke Road, Gosport Hampshire, PO12 1EJ
HAV/24UF/LDC/2025/0745 · dispensation from consultation · Gosport · decided 11 Mar 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the EWS1 survey needed to assess the block for external cladding works, finding the leaseholders suffered no prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cray House Residents Company Limited |
| Management company | Cray House Residents Company Limited |
| Managing agent | KJB Residential Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
BLOCK OF 24 FLATS, HAS LOWER GROUND CAR PARK
- freeholder
Applicant : Cray House Residents Company Limited
- agent
Representative : KJB Residential Property Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation under
- s20
the Tribunal grants the application for dispensation under section 20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.