Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GU29 9UA

Cowdray Court, 1-25 North Street, Midhurst, West Sussex GU29 9UA

CHI/45UD/LDC/2024/0106 · dispensation from consultation · Chichester · decided 30 Aug 2024

The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application for dispensation from consultation requirements because the agreement with the monitoring company was not a qualifying long-term agreement, and the charges were in any case under £100 per dwelling, so the landlord must bear the tribunal fees.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordTelegraph Management Limited
Management companyTelegraph Management Limited
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 24 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£2,240.43
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedapplicant to bear the tribunal fees for the application

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
being 24 dwellings in total
freeholder
Applicant : Telegraph Management Limited
outcome
the application for dispensation is dismissed
total demanded
The relevant total for the service charges was £2240.43.
costs
determines that the Applicant must bear the fees for the application.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.