Copyground Court High Wycombe Bucks HP12 3HG
CAM/00MX/LDC/2025/0629 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 11 Jul 2025
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent repair or rebuilding of a retaining wall on the amenity land, limited to the quoted contractor's fixed price, with other costs remaining subject to the usual challenge and the £250 annual cap.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 28 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant bears its own costs of the application, which may be recovered as service charge subject to challenge |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property is a block of 28No. flats
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.