College Farm Drive, Sutton St Marys, New Oscott, Birmingham, B23 5YE
BIR/00CN/LDC/2026/0003 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 19 Jun 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for the emergency drainage pipe lining works carried out in November 2025, so the landlord may proceed without full consultation, although the reasonableness of the costs remains open to challenge later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
being 25, 27, 29, and 31 College Farm Drive, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 Wiseman Grove
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Application is granted.
- s20
The Tribunal determines that the Application is granted. The Respondent may dispense with the consultation requirements contained in section 20 of the Act in respect of the carrying out of the Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.