Clarendon House, 17-19 Clarendon Street, NG1 5HR
BIR/00FY/LDC/2024/0004 · dispensation from consultation · Nottingham · decided 26 Jul 2024
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Clarendon House (Nottingham) Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Clarendon House (Nottingham) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Mapperley Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property comprises a building containing thirteen flats
- freeholder
The Applicant is the residents’ management company of [name] House
- agent
Representative : Mapperley Property Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.