City Link, Hessel Street, Salford, M50 1DB
MAN/00BR/LDC/2021/0015 · dispensation from consultation · Salford · decided 16 Jul 2021
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent works to upgrade the fire alarm system at City Link, but made no finding on whether the resulting charges are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rockwell (FC101) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 212 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
two purpose built blocks containing 212 apartments
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to urgent works to upgrade the fire alarm system.
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to urgent works to upgrade the fire alarm system.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.