Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near S10 1GQ

Church Mews 2-6 (evens) Wesley Lane, 8 & 295-307 (odds), School Road, Crookes, Sheffield S10 1GQ

MAN/00CG/LDC/2025/0656 · dispensation from consultation · Sheffield · decided 20 Mar 2026

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire alarm and sounder works carried out between 31 January and 19 February 2025, limited to those works and without affecting any future consultation.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordTrinity (Estates) Property Management Ltd
Management companyTrinity (Estates) Property Management Ltd
Managing agentnone named
BuildingAn estate, 3 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£3,947.70
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
The Applicant, [name] (Estates) Property Management Ltd, is the management
outcome
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20
total demanded
The total cost incurred was £3,947.70 (VAT inclusive).
s20
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.