Christabel, 106 Dalton Street, Manchester M40 7EH
MAN/00BN/LDC/2023/0012 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 20 Jul 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord's management company unconditional dispensation under section 20ZA from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency water heater replacement works carried out at the building in 2018.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Christabel and Sylvia (Manchester) Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Limited |
| Building | A block, 62 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising a 13 storey building with 62 residential apartments
- freeholder
was made on 31 January 2023 by [name] (Manchester) Management Limited
- agent
Applicant’s : Residential Management Group Limited
- outcome
Accordingly, the tribunal makes an unconditional determination under section
- s20
Accordingly, the tribunal makes an unconditional determination under section
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.