CHI/23UE/LSC/2023/0067
CHI/23UE/LSC/2023/0067 · service charges · Gloucester · decided 22 May 2024
The tribunal decided that the £4,200 budgeted for replacing the windows of Flat 11 is not payable by the leaseholders, because the external windows form part of the building's structure, which the landlord must repair or replace and which the service charge cannot recover.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallbank House (Manager) Limited |
| Management company | Wallbank House (Manager) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £4,200 |
| Total found payable | £4,200 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] House (Manager) Limited
- years
the 2024 service charge year
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum for window replacement in the 2024 service charge budget for the Property amounting to £4,200 is not payable by the Respondents.
- items reduced
the sum for window replacement in the 2024 service charge budget for the Property amounting to £4,200 is not payable by the Respondents
- total demanded
The total amount in dispute is £4,200.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.